Citation: Palmquist, Michael, Kate Kiefer, James Hartivigsen, and Barbara Goodlew. Contrasts:Teaching and Learning About Writing in Traditional and Computer Classrooms."Computers in the Composition Classroom: A Critical Sourcebook. Ed. Michelle Sidler, Richard Morris, and Elizabeth Overman Smith. New York: Bedford/St.Martin’s Press, 2008. 251-270.
Reading and Thinking
Palmquist, Kiefer, Hartivigsen, and Goodlew recount two pragmatic studies designed to assist educators as they cross boundaries between teaching in traditional and online settings. These studies, which compared classroom settings and student behaviors/attitudes over time, led to a number of themes:
(1) Differences in classroom settings impacted daily planning.
(2) Teachers adopted more “take charge” roles in the traditional setting and more decentralized roles in online settings.
(3) Computer classroom students talked more often with teachers.
(4) Students used computer classrooms as a worksite whereas traditional classroom students resisted writing activities.
(5) Teachers were able to transfer more successful activities from computer to traditional settings.
(6) When educators believed in the pedagogical benefits, teachers who were less familiar with technology resisted using it.
(7) Students in the two settings differed in their attitudes about writing, writing performance, previous writing instruction, and interaction.
In the writing classroom, all of these elements are important, but the instructor has to figure out what "really" works. The educator has be well informed on of whom they are teaching in order to figure out how to make technology effective. Technology works well from what I have experienced.